Editing manuscripts for publishing papers

Medical journals have specific instructions for authors, including word counts and format (see example here).  

Abiding by style guides is often what takes the most time when authors wish to re-submit papers to different journals, especially when English is not their first language.

Although some publications embrace the use of templates, others have opted to allow for free-form first submission.

I started working on research manuscripts by focusing at the paragraph level. This microediting examined the function of the language, to determine whether it supported the author’s intention. 

The goal of microediting is to 

increase the value of the document 

by improving grammar, syntax, style, 

tone, clarity, and credibility.

I'm much more interested in the content. Substantive editing permits the shaping of the broad focus, or architecture, of a scientific document. Let's call it the big picture.

The goal of macroediting is to 

ensure that authors are conveying what they intend

by focusing on the unity, 

congruence, and coherence of a document. 

Nevertheless, if the text is not clear, the meaning can not be conveyed.

The first hurdle a paper needs to get through in its path to publication is that of desk rejection. If the text is confusing and incomprehensible, the editorial board will not send the manuscript for review.

 

To ensure that a peer reviewer reads your paper, get the small things right:

• Ensure that all figures, tables, and references are cited in the text.

• Check the page numbering and the numbering of figures, tables, and graphs.

• Thoroughly check grammar and spelling.

• Check for subject/verb agreement and placement of verbs.

• Ensure that acronyms are spelled out at first use.

• Prune useless or redundant words, and jargon.

• Use patient-first language. 

  
  

According to the CDC, patient-first language (also known as people-first language) is defined as “emphasizing the person, not the disability,” and is the correct way of referring to patients. For example, instead of using the term “epileptics,” patient-first language would use the phrase “patients with epilepsy.” 

 

Using patient-first language may take up more space on the page, but it is an important way to encourage healthcare professionals to consider the entire patient, and not just focus on the disease or condition. Most readers also prefer the use of person-first language (saying what the patient has and not what the patient is), as this eliminates marginalization and dehumanization. 

Don't ignore how you communicate your findings, but ultimately research is based on reasoning and critical analysis. Lots of services out there provide editing and proofreading, increasingly with the aid of AI tools.  

 

Focus on the content, and let others sweat the small stuff.